Full Paper Templates

The full paper should be no less than 5 full pages. Manuscripts must be written in English and follow the instructions at Manuscript Formatting and Templates. Papers not respecting the formatting instructions or page limits may be rejected without review.

Innovation and scientific value is a must. And to ensure the high quality of the accepted papers, all submissions will be peer-reviewed. Please only submit original material where copyright of all parts is owned by the authors declared and which is not currently under review elsewhere.

Accepted and presented papers will be published into conference proceedings, will be included in the major data base, Ei Compendex, Scopus, etc.

Full Paper Template (Word) Full Paper Template (LaTeX)

Abstract Template

For those papers do not want to be published but presenting and discussing at the conference, you can submit an abstract first, for presentation only. Your abstract will not be published but only included in the conference program book.

Abstract Template (Word)

Submission Methods

Once you prepared your paper, please submit your full paper or abstract via CMT submission sysytem or e-mail ( In order to avoid repeated submission, please just choose one submisson method.

CMT Submission System

E-mail Address

▪ First-time users of CMT should register a account firstly, then upload your paper to the system.
▪ Your submission will be confirmed immediately by the system and in 2-3 working days by conference secretary.
▪ For any inquiry about the submission, please feel free to contact us at

Review Process

All submissions to the CPSSE 2024 will be reviewed:

CPSSE Editors perform an initial review of the manuscript's suitability to ensure the submission falls within the scope of the conference upon receipt. And each manuscript will be checked if it has potential problem of plagiarism. Papers not passing the plagiarism checking or the topic is out of the conference will be rejected immediately.

Only the papers passed the initial check will be double-blind peer-reviewed by 2 or 3 independent reviewers. Reviewers evaluate submissions based on the requirements of the conference proceedings, predefined criteria, and quality, completeness, originality and grammar of the research presented.

Authors are required to respond to the peer review comments in details and make minor or major revisions according to the points raised. The revised paper will be evaluated again. Usually, one round of major revisions is allowed. Acceptance is granted when reviewers' recommendations are positive.